Scholarship and Libraries in Transiton : A Dialogue about the Impacts of Mass Digitization (Shorthand Notes)

Most of this has already been covered here (first post, reverse chronological), here, and here.

Offical Symposium Weblog – the webcast should be available soon…I’ll post here when it is…

With the copious amounts of documentation available there, why should I even bother? Cause I’m pretty sure I have to write up a review of it anyways for the job – and this’ll probably bring my brain back around to it. These are notes I scratched down — and are not nearly as detailed as the above. A little personal flair, if you will.

To start with — a summary: Disruptive Technology > Change > Copyright. Those are probably the three biggest themes…with Collaboration just behind…and Library as Space…

There was also ample discussion concerning Wikipedia. It seemed nearly all speakers made a reference to it at some point.

I attended in person on Friday – but watched the webcast in my pj’s on Saturday — and the notes very much reflect that…


Panels: Library | Keynote | Research | Publishing | Adam Smith / Google | Economics

People: Barbara Allen | Suzanne BeDell | Paul Courant | Daniel Greenstein | Jean-Claude Guédon | Michael Keller | Tim O’Reilly | Karl Pohrt | Adam Smith | Ed Tenner | Hal Varian | Alicia Wise | Karin Wittenborg | Ann Wolpert |

Panel Session: Libraries

Josie Parker (moderator) Director, AADL -

Audience QA: Audience member provides one of the best points of the conference — a matter of linguistics — we should speak about materials RISING into the public domain — not as FALLING.


Barbara Allen – Director, Committee on Institutional Cooperation

  • Research Library Trends
  • Changes in User Behavior
  • Building Collections
  • Actions
    2003-2004 ARL Report

  • Circulation / Reference Below 1991 levels – fewer people coming into the library
  • Interlibrary loans are up 148% [wow!]
  • Users demonstrating clear preference for digital format, even if available in print – for example – JSTOR – print items were used 692 times, in the same period – the digital format was accessed 12,000 times.
  • Expenditures for collections up 4x while staffing per student is down, and 17% fewer products available.
  • 1994 – 63 libraries – $11million dollars in electronic resources
  • 2004 – 100 libraries – $270 million dollars in electronic resources — 14 libraries, 50% entire budget e-resources – mostly commercial publishers – journal literature
  • OCLC database — 32 million records – NEARLY 40% UNIQUE PRINT BOOKS – 50% FROM BEFORE 1977
  • Opportunity for collaboration in digitization.
    Converging Trends

  1. University Libaries must rethink their space — democratic OPEN space — bringing people together
  2. Organizing principle: coherent ACCESS — partner with others – commercial and public collaboration to digitize unique records across organizational boundaries
  3. Develop intelligence about our collections

A means to acheiving public happiness. We have the keys — without corrections – we are half monks — half beasts.


Michael Keller — University Librarian, Stanford University
Litigations…

  1. Change terms of reference…
    • The notion that the library is a building…
    • The library of the mind
    • The effect of the library on the scholar.
    • The library is also an ethereal ideal
    • Electronic card catalog — 50% increase in use
    • Indexing by google increased hits on Highwire – from 10 – 15 million to a 1 – 1.5 billion
    • Increasing ROI
  2. Beyond Intellectual Access
    • Sales of current books increase when you can search the books
  3. Beyond Indexing
    • Increase stock of knowledge – find new connections
    • Not just about snippets, INTELLECTUAL ACCESS
  4. INNOVATION
    • Taxonomical index:

    • Informatics
    • ***citation linking from footnotes in books***
    • — Navigating information topographys — :)
    • information in an explicit context
    • A “who’s reading?” service — (AADL already has something going on with their HOT items).
    • highlight names — direct link to biographies
  5. Copyright and Fair Use
    • Orphan works decision – amendment – 1923 – 1964 books not registered
    • Section 108 – Copyright law — for archival reasons – to allow for reading online
    • FAIR USE
    • Intellectual Freedom
    • Access to Information
    • Alexandria library — Discussion of 500,000 books in the Arabic language waiting to be digitized revealing a more liberal history of the Middle East — Jenica pulled a nice quote so I’ll grab it as well — “If the people in these embattled lands can see the importance of preserving the universe of information in their culture, surely we can do the same.”


Karin Wittenborg – University Librarian, University of West Virginia

    Google Project

  • One of the most important projects — mass digitization will CHANGE everything
  • Changing the status quo is a good thing
  • Major redeployment of resources
    Space

  • Physical library – much depends on what we as librarians do in our reinventing
  • “Libraries are sinkholes for space
    Things we might do differently

  • What are we going to do with our own space? Utilizing
  • Libary as an Intellectual crossroads
  • To discuss ideas
  • Programming
    Role of libarians
  • Intellectual Freedom
  • Access
  • rigorous stewards
  • Q&A

    More group study spaces…fewer paraprofessional staff…more professional staff…digitization resulting in index to contents…democratization of information…digital repositories…

    Most works go out of print w/in 5 years of publishing…Article I of the Constitution — Section 8: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

      Disaster Planning Question

    • What needs to be redundant?
    • Resource disruptions – great opportunity for collaboration
    • Comment from Smithsonian Institute: Katrina is an argument for digitization…
    • If information is in digital format – I can get it – by driving to the nearest network — or just getting to the network
    • If information is in print — imagine trying to xerox a 342 page document
    • ♥Putting a copy of the Fair Use statute next to every copy machine♥

    Keynote

    Tim O’Reilly
    Tim O'Reilly

      What Job does a Library do?

    • The preservation of information
    • Archive.org vs Library of Congress — shows graph of archive.org dwarfing LOC in hits…
      Why the Google Project matters

    • Free is replaced by commercial ecology only when you let it go
    • Last.fm vs. Pandora — Both suggest new music — but last.fm has the plugin Audioscrobbler which listens to what you actually play when you’re not listening to the service to better gauge your listening habits.
      • The Orphaned Works problem

        • Books:

        • 4% in print – [amazon search inside this book]
        • -75% or more – The Twilight Zone © Not for sale, rights reverted to author, may be in the public domain
        • -20% public domain – Open Content Alliance
        • 32 million unique titles in all U.S. libraries
      • Fewer than 4% of books are commercially exploited
      • ***DRM is a lot more like a cat than a dog — When you take a cat to the vet – you hold it loosely – whereas you take a dog to the vet — you hold him tight***
      • The near term opportunity
      The Long Tail
      Does Online Search Drive Discovery?

    • Compare sales of physical books versus e-books
    • Print Books show 6% spike in sales with online library searches
    • Safari tech books show 23% spike in sales
    • Google Print v. Bookscan
      Building a Digital Economy

    • Incentives for turning books free
    • Depending on the job a book does – Reference may eventually be entirely online
      How will publishing itself change? Visions of the future

    • Web 2.0 – The Internet as a platform – Information Businesses
    • Software as a service, harnessing collective intelligence
    • Once you’re on the network, how do you gain value from your users? COLLABORATION
    • Amazon — 10,000,000 user reviews – on every page – amazon asks the user to add value
      • The Perpetual Beta – Ongoing Services

      • Rough Cuts — giving access while the book is being written, watch it grow and comment while it is being published
      • Asks how many people use linux? A few raise their hands. How many people use Google? Everybody raises their hands.Google is a linux application.
      • Data is the next Intel Inside – applications are increasingly data driven
    • Concern of the publisher — all of the data lying with one producer
    • An internet of interoperability
    • Platform beats an application every time
    • Safari API – A Web Services Based Help System
    • Bookster?

    Panel Session: Research

    Ed Tenner — Professor & Author, Princeton University

      Unintended Consequences: The future of search; the future of libraries

    • Literacy level controversy – several stories on the low levels of literacy amongst the incoming college freshmen
    • Google searching and the “good enough” syndrome of relying on the first page of hits
    • Comparison with Clusty
    • World History: Wikipedia v Britannica (there is no entry
    • Everything Bad is Good for You – but does this mean that everything good is bad for you?
      Academics and Open Source

    • Search Engine Optimization? – In the 21st Century – “Good Enough” isn’t

    [It should be noted that Superpatron pressed Mr. Tenner on his remarks on Wikipedia's version of World History -- which Mr. Tenner found to be inadequate -- asking if Mr. Tenner then contributed to the page. Mr. Tenner said he hadn't - but that maybe now he would, and write a paper on it. Looks like he could be pursuing that avenue].


    Jean-Claude Guédon – Professor, University of Montreal

      Mass Printing v. Mass Digitization
  • shifts in nature/essence
  • documents are changing nature with media
  • Encycolopedia — A snapshot of the world at the moment
  • Wikipedia — a process
  • ♥ Google as narcissism: Better than a mirror ♥
    • Digitization of our culture — Possibilities

    • Dissertations and theses – citation metrics – reorganizing the map of knowledge…
    • Concordances — finding the least used 100 words
    • H.G. Wells – The World Brain
    • Wittgenstein - language games — communities — the semantic web


    Ann J Wolpert – Director of the Libraries, M.I.T.
    Research / Teaching / Learning

  • Google Scholar — expectations for user interfaces are being driven by amazon
  • [There were lots of audio problems here -- and I found this to be the slowest part of the entire symposium - so not much noted...check the others]

    BREAK
    breakout

    Publishing Panel


    Suzanne BeDell – Vice President, ProQuest Information and Learning

  • mass quantities of information are meaningless when varied
  • evidence matters – Proquest 14,000,000 documents digitized
  • collaboration

  • Alicia Wise – Chief Executive, Publishers Licensing Society

      Publishers and Google
  • The vision – to make the world’s information available to all — noble
  • Google print for libraries – placing the information into a single players hands
  • perceived cavalier attitude — misunderstanding of copyright
  • copyright laws are from the 17th century — they need to evolve
    • Vision

    • Growth in digital markets
    • value added services


    Daniel Greenstein University Librarian and Executive Director, California Digital Library

      Open Content Alliance

    • Placing the information into a single player’s hands

    The Publisher’s panel left me wondering — if you’re so concerned with one player having all the information – and you keep talking about collaboration and the expansion of the market – Why aren’t you contributing as well, and if you are – why aren’t you doing it better?


    Adam Smith – Google – Funny how difficult it is to find a bio page for him…
    adam smith

      Google Books

    • Full Book View – Public Domain – 20%
    • Sample Pages View – 5%
    • Snippet View – 75%

    Graph that showed that when it comes to Google Books — google is doing the digitization, hosting, indexing and authentication of the materials. In google scholar — google is only indexing.

      Discovery

    • Full-text search
    • Serendipitous Discovery
    • Comprehensiveness requires collaboration
    • 67% of monographs known by OCLC not held by current partners
    • 60% titles are unique
    • Discovery metadata and Google — URL LCCN
    • Examples of way people are using googlebooks to make lists

    Here’s where I asked my question – and somewhat bungled it. Something to the effect of — You showed us the greasemonkey script that allows one to look up materials in the local library, and your books in the libary project have “find in a library” links in them — but ALL of your books – or at least most of them — have ISBN’s — and therefore should be able to have a “find in a library” link. I’m just wondering -why the discrepancy — and why are you letting your users write your programs for you?”

    I SHOULD HAVE SAID: Why do your users HAVE to write your programs for you?

    What I remember him saying: We love that our users write these programs…It is part of our agreement [the find in a libary links]…

    Why I don’t remember anything else:
    Everything went black except for the microphone — which pulsated in front of me…Stagefright? Adrenaline? I felt like I was in fight or flight mode…

    Anyways — Saturday –
    I woke up and logged on in my pjs and only took a few notes:

    Panel Session: Economics

    Paul Courant – Professor, University of Michigan

  • The services become more important in libraries
  • Who’s the trusted agent: librarians.
  • How are we going to organize business to support them
  • You can’t have a market that works well if you don’t have the rights well established [copyright]

  • Hal Varian Professor, University of California, Berkeley

  • Kelly v Arriba Soft
  • Disruptive technology — Whose behaviour is going to change?
  • Ann Arbor sunset from the Maynard Parking Deck

    moi

    Like I said — not many notes on Saturday…
    I did, however, take Karl Pohrt up on his recommendation and checked out Accelerando from my library…

    Panels: Library | Keynote | Research | Publishing | Adam Smith / Google | Economics

    People: Barbara Allen | Suzanne BeDell | Paul Courant | Daniel Greenstein | Jean-Claude Guédon | Michael Keller | Tim O’Reilly | Karl Pohrt | Adam Smith | Ed Tenner | Hal Varian | Alicia Wise | Karin Wittenborg | Ann Wolpert |

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • del.icio.us
    • Facebook
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Twitter
    This entry was posted in Librarianship and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>